Israel election voters are heading to the polls in a contest that could reshape the country’s security policy, governing coalition and relationship with the wider world. Early polling indicates a close race between incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, while neither political camp is expected to secure the majority needed to govern alone.
Israel election enters decisive final stage
Israel’s proportional representation system means governments are formed through coalitions rather than by a single party winning power outright. The Knesset requires a bloc to control 61 seats for a parliamentary majority, but current projections suggest that both the Netanyahu-led alliance and Eisenkot’s opposition grouping could fall short.
That raises the prospect of lengthy negotiations after the vote. Parties may seek senior government posts, policy concessions or guarantees before deciding which candidate to support. If no workable coalition emerges, Israel could face another election, with Netanyahu remaining caretaker prime minister in the meantime.
Netanyahu relies on security credentials
Netanyahu has built his campaign around national security, presenting himself as the leader best equipped to confront threats across the Middle East. He has pointed to Israel’s military actions and his relationship with US President Donald Trump as evidence of his diplomatic and strategic influence.
His opponents, however, continue to focus on the security failures surrounding the Hamas-led attacks of 7 October. Nearly 1,200 people were killed and 251 were taken hostage, according to the figures cited in the campaign. Opposition parties are demanding an independent inquiry, while Netanyahu has resisted calls for a commission, arguing that it could be politically biased.
Eisenkot leads a diverse change bloc
Eisenkot’s Yashar Party sits at the centre of a broad alliance whose main shared objective is replacing Netanyahu. The grouping includes former prime minister Naftali Bennett, right-wing politician Avigdor Lieberman and left-leaning former general Yair Golan.
The parties differ sharply on economic policy, religion and the future of the occupied West Bank. Their cooperation is therefore likely to depend on difficult compromises. Eisenkot has broadly similar views to Netanyahu on defeating Hamas, but has also discussed creating conditions for Palestinian autonomy under continuing Israeli security control.
Security, Gaza and military service dominate campaign
The war in Gaza remains central to the election. Israel says its continuing strikes target Hamas operatives, while Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry reports more than 74,000 deaths since the conflict began. The figures are regarded as reliable by the United Nations, although Israel disputes aspects of the reporting.
Israel has faced increasing international criticism over the conduct of the war, and its relations with several allies have deteriorated. Eisenkot has pledged to end Hamas rule within 18 months, either through a US-backed peace framework or military action if necessary.
Another major dispute concerns the military draft. Netanyahu’s coalition has not enforced a Supreme Court ruling requiring ultra-Orthodox men studying full-time in religious institutions to serve in the armed forces. The issue has become especially contentious as large numbers of other Israelis have been mobilised during recent conflicts.
Far-right influence and democratic concerns
Netanyahu’s governing coalition includes far-right and ultra-Orthodox parties, making it the most right-wing government in Israel’s history. Far-right ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich remain influential figures, particularly on security and settlement policy.
The opposition also highlights Netanyahu’s ongoing corruption trial, which he denies, and his controversial proposals to reform the judiciary. Those plans sparked mass protests before the 7 October attacks and remain a symbol of Israel’s deep political divisions.
Eisenkot supports Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank but has said extremist settler violence should be confronted. United Nations figures indicate that attacks by extremist Jewish settlers have reached record levels. Meanwhile, the idea of a negotiated two-state solution has largely disappeared from mainstream Israeli political debate.
Arab parties could hold balance of power
Arab citizens make up roughly one-fifth of Israel’s population, and two Arab party blocs are contesting the election. In theory, their seats could determine which side forms a government. However, nearly all major Jewish parties have ruled out a formal coalition with them.
Some observers have suggested that Arab lawmakers could support an Eisenkot-led minority administration without joining it. Lieberman, viewed as a potentially important coalition partner, has rejected that possibility. These red lines make the post-election arithmetic particularly unpredictable.
What happens after polls close?
Exit polls are expected at 22:00 local time on Tuesday, although they may not accurately predict the final result. Hundreds of thousands of soldiers and reservists will vote, and many of their ballots may be counted later, potentially changing the apparent balance between the blocs.
Reports indicate that around 70,000 Israelis have returned from overseas to vote, while approximately half a million people may be participating in an election for the first time. Party supporters will gather in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv as results arrive throughout the night.
Read more: Ireland breaking news and international headlines for updates on major global developments.
Why a political deadlock is possible
The election is often described as a contest between Netanyahu and Eisenkot, but Israel’s coalition system leaves room for another party leader to emerge as a compromise prime minister. A smaller party could withhold support until offered the premiership or substantial policy guarantees.
Political deadlock would not be unprecedented. Israel held five elections between 2019 and 2022 after parties repeatedly failed to reach durable agreements. A similar outcome could delay decisions on security, conscription, judicial reform and relations with the Palestinians.
Explore more: Follow latest Irish news and global political analysis, plus international affairs and current world stories.
What the Israel election could mean
The result will affect more than the identity of Israel’s next prime minister. It could determine whether the country continues with a right-wing coalition, shifts towards a broader centrist alliance or enters another period of instability.
The central questions are already clear: how Israel responds to the Gaza war, whether military service rules are enforced equally, how far judicial changes proceed and whether any political path remains open for Palestinian self-government. With no bloc projected to win outright, the decisive battle may begin after the ballots are counted.
Frequently asked questions
Who is contesting the Israel election?
The main contest is between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, although several parties and leaders could influence the eventual government.
How does Israel form a government?
Israel uses proportional representation. Parties must negotiate a coalition capable of commanding at least 61 seats in the Knesset.
Could Israel hold another election?
Yes. If no bloc can form a majority or a viable minority government, new elections could be called and Netanyahu would remain interim prime minister.
Why is military conscription controversial?
The dispute centres on whether ultra-Orthodox men studying full-time in religious institutions should be required to serve, as ordered by Israel’s Supreme Court.
Conclusion
The Israel election is a pivotal test of Netanyahu’s security-focused leadership and Eisenkot’s attempt to unite a fragmented opposition. Because neither bloc appears certain to win 61 seats, coalition negotiations—and the possibility of renewed deadlock—may matter as much as election night itself. The clearest takeaway is that Israel’s next government will be shaped by difficult bargains over war, democracy, military service and the country’s future direction.