The Omagh bombing inquiry has heard that there was likely some form of operational co-operation between the Real IRA and the Continuity IRA before the 1998 atrocity. The evidence forms part of the inquiry’s examination of how the attack was organised and whether it could have been prevented.
What the Omagh bombing inquiry heard
John Morrison, an associate professor of criminology at Maynooth University and an expert on dissident republicanism, gave evidence on Tuesday. He told the inquiry that material available to him indicated co-operation between members of the Real IRA and Continuity IRA.
Lead counsel Paul Greaney said the Real IRA leadership remained the “lead instigators” of the bombing, while suggesting that the operation may have involved a broader network of dissident republican groups.
The Omagh bombing on August 15th, 1998, killed 31 people, including unborn twins, and injured hundreds more when a car bomb exploded in the centre of the County Tyrone town.
How the Real IRA developed
The inquiry examined the split from the Provisional IRA that led to the formation of the Real IRA in 1997. Evidence identified Michael McKevitt, formerly quartermaster general of the Provisional IRA, as a central figure in establishing the new organisation.
At the time of the bombing, the Real IRA was described as a relatively new group with as many as 90 members. Around one-third were believed to have been actively involved in violence. Despite its limited size, the organisation had members with considerable experience, operational knowledge and access to weapons.
Professor Morrison said the group’s strategic objective was to destabilise the peace process. Reports submitted to the inquiry described an ambition to conduct a sustained bombing campaign in Northern Ireland and Britain before attempting to reclaim influence over the wider republican movement.
Disagreement over bombing tactics
Evidence suggested that senior figures initially disagreed about the group’s methods. One proposal focused on attacks against military targets. Another favoured car bombs in towns, a tactic regarded as inexpensive, relatively simple to prepare and easier to transport.
The inquiry heard that concerns existed within the organisation about the risk to civilians. However, the car-bombing strategy ultimately prevailed. The consequences were devastating in Omagh, where the explosion struck a busy town centre and caused widespread loss of life and injury.
Key points from the evidence
- The Real IRA was formed after a split from the Provisional IRA in 1997.
- The group had a relatively small membership but included experienced paramilitaries.
- Evidence pointed to an ambition to undermine the peace process.
- There was likely operational co-operation with the Continuity IRA.
- The inquiry’s working hypothesis is that both groups planned and carried out the bombing at an organisational level.
Follow further Ireland News and Northern Ireland News developments at DailyDigest.
Evidence of a wider operational coalition
Professor Morrison’s reports referred to Liam Campbell developing an operational relationship with the Continuity IRA and the Irish National Liberation Army. The inquiry heard that he had reportedly sought to create an active service unit that could bring together members of several organisations.
The evidence did not suggest that every member of those groups was involved. Instead, it concerned the possibility of co-operation between particular individuals and operational elements. That distinction is important as the inquiry assesses responsibility for the bombing.
Sources presented to the inquiry identified senior roles within the Real IRA, including McKevitt as quartermaster general and Liam Campbell as director of operations. A man known by the alias Frank McGuinness was identified as the group’s first chief of staff.
Why the inquiry matters
The public inquiry opened in 2024 under its chair, Alan Turnbull. It was ordered by the UK government to examine whether the bombing could reasonably have been prevented by British state authorities.
Its current chapter is focused on how the attack was carried out and who was responsible. The inquiry is expected to spend approximately five weeks examining the organisation, planning and execution of the bombing.
The proceedings are separate from the 2009 civil case in which four men, including Michael McKevitt and Liam Campbell, were found liable for the Omagh bombing. The inquiry’s task is broader: it is assessing the available intelligence, investigative opportunities and actions of state authorities before the attack.
What happens next?
The inquiry resumed in Belfast on Monday. Alongside evidence about dissident republican organisations, it has heard from an expert on forensic techniques available in 1997 and 1998. Evidence on mobile phone cell-tower analysis is also scheduled.
Further testimony is expected to examine communications, movements, bomb-making capabilities and the intelligence available before August 15th, 1998. Because the inquiry is ongoing, its working hypothesis may be refined as additional witnesses and documents are considered.
Frequently asked questions
When did the Omagh bombing happen?
The bombing took place on August 15th, 1998, in the centre of Omagh, County Tyrone.
How many people died?
Thirty-one people died, including unborn twins. Hundreds of others were injured.
What is the inquiry examining?
The inquiry is examining how the bombing was planned and carried out, who was responsible, and whether British state authorities could reasonably have prevented it.
What groups are being discussed in the evidence?
The evidence has focused on the Real IRA and the Continuity IRA, with references also made to possible operational links involving the INLA.
Conclusion
The latest evidence in the Omagh bombing inquiry points to likely operational co-operation between dissident republican groups, while identifying the Real IRA leadership as central to the attack. The proceedings remain ongoing, and future testimony will determine how the inquiry assesses the planning, communications and opportunities for prevention. For readers following Breaking News Ireland, the case remains one of the most significant continuing investigations into the legacy of the Troubles.
